Tech-Sector Neoliberalism Isn’t the Answer to America’s Inequality Problem

"Eric schmidt is the chairman of google last year he raked in compensation totaling over 100 million from the company adding to his net worth of over 8 billion according to the new york times schmidt owns a gulfstream v a 195 foot yacht and multiple homes across the country including a new 22 million hollywood mansion last week he addressed the sxsw conference on the topic of economic inequality i mean who better right he proposed three basic fixes for the problem one is strengthening the safety net for the less well off i am definitely with him there the united states is one of the richest societies the world has ever known but it has a remarkably ungenerous welfare state so so far we re good the war on poverty worked and it would work even better if programs like food stamps medicaid and the eitc were expanded schmidt s second idea involves devoting more resources to education in the science and technology fields this may be a good idea but there is no evidence that it will decrease inequality the education policies that would probably do the most to fight inequality would be enacting universal pre k and making college more affordable by making public colleges tuition free and increasing financial aid for students studies have found that early childhood education programs lead to greatly enhanced employment and education outcomes for poor children the high cost of college is putting the brakes on social mobility by preventing many talented students from acquiring an education research shows that low income students with high test scores are less likely to graduate from college than low scoring rich kids finally we come to schmidt s third recommendation which is for the government to give more support to start ups as slate s jordan weissmann s notes part of what he means by this support is more deregulation in areas like energy and telecommunications but as scholars of deregulation such as thomas o mcgarity have pointed out the deregulatory mania we ve seen since the 1970s has been one of the engines of inequality in the us economy it s led to rent seeking bonanzas that have vastly enriched and empowered the one percent at the expense of everyone else indeed when his interlocutor pressed him on this third point schmidt could hardly be any clearer about his ideological bent the solution to this displacement according to schmidt is to foster conditions that encourage the creation of fast growing startups that generate lots of jobs or gazelles those conditions include better education looser immigration laws and deregulation in strictly controlled areas like energy and telecommunications when levy noted that fast growing gazelles seem to lead to more inequality at least in the case of the 50 employee whatsapp which was acquired by facebook for a reported 19 billion schmidt brushed aside the apparent contradiction let us celebrate capitalism he said opening his arms 19 billion for 50 people good for them touting 19 billion for fifty people as a cure all for inequality i thought tom perkins s kristallnact letter was the ultimate in 1 percenter absurdity this year but really that comment is the one that has earned the billionaire chutzpah prize and of course as is often the case what s most revealing of all are the things schmidt is not saying he breathed not a word for example about increasing the minimum wage building stronger labor unions or enacting macroeconomic policies that promote a full employment economy the most telling silence however involved policies that require that anything in the way of sacrifice from schmidt and his 1 percenter buddies as researchers such as thomas piketty have documented economic inequality is a phenomenon being driven largely by the top 1 percent of the income distribution as such policies designed to control it need to be targeted at the rich piketty suggests a wealth tax and a return to top marginal tax rates of 80 percent or more other economists advocate restricting 1 percenters rent seeking opportunities by re regulating the financial sector and reforming intellectual property laws and corporate governance you won t hear any of those kinds of proposals coming out of schmidt s mouth though instead he s asking for additional giveaways to the tech sector from uncle sam indeed he s even publicly boasted that he is very proud of google s massive tax avoidance schemes google funneled about 80 percent of its pre tax profits to an off shore bank account in 2011 eric schmidt may sound like just another variation of a greed is good republican but here s the depressing thing the dude is a major democratic donor who s been an adviser to president obama obama even considered him for commerce secretary schmidt s politics seem very much akin to robert rubin s leaving the economic privileges of the powerful unchecked while penciling in a little welfare capitalism for the poor yes this is preferable than the likes of tom perkins but is a party dominated by the cool billionaires like schmidt and rubin the best the democrats can offer

Keep on reading: Tech-Sector Neoliberalism Isn’t the Answer to America’s Inequality Problem